|
Post by KSSunflower on May 2, 2019 4:07:10 GMT -6
Laura Brotherson recently wrote this latterdaysaintmag.com/raising-the-bar-on-intimate-relationships/This is Part 1 of an article that goes over 20 characteristics that help determine healthy and unhealthy sexuality. I appreciated her mention of these topics especially, -Affection for its own sake, not just something that leads to sex. -Agency vs entitlement -More than orgasm and physical pleasure, aspiring to deepen interpersonal connection. -Being fully present and engaged, not just going through the motions. - Multi-dimensional intimacy. Including "mental, emotional and even spiritual intimacy and connection—in addition to the sexual." I don't like the constant stereotyping of male and female sexual behavior. I realize that is based on the experience that wives are commonly the lower desire spouse. However, I think by continually labeling women or men a certain way we reinforce a belief that this is how they are supposed to be and it's mostly unchangeable. I think the fact that younger generations are able to grow up with better sexual outlooks should indicate that our sexual differences are often put there through nurture, not nature.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 2, 2019 15:45:12 GMT -6
I found a good portion of the list fairly good, however, she talks about eliminating pressure to perform and the belief of entitlement. Being flexible is certainly understandable, but I think within marriage, entitlement is a part of the deal. If the entire documented process of marriage does not provide consent, what on earth does? What on earth can? If marriage does not grant a man sexual rights to his wife's body, why on earth should any man ever marry a woman in the first place? What, precisely, does a man acquire in return for the right of permanent claims on his material wealth and income; remember that a contract is not even legally a contract if obligations are not assigned to both parties. How is a woman's husband even theoretically distinguishable from every other individual on the planet if he has no more rights to her body than anyone else?
|
|
|
Post by edshubby on May 10, 2019 14:16:37 GMT -6
I wouldn’t say that you have unlimited rights to your wife’s body. As long as there must still be consent, any rights you may have are limited.
I would reframe it this way. The whole point of marriage is to become one, in body, mind, heart, and spirit. So to the extent that the low drive spouse refuses to be physically intimate, or the high drive spouse demands that which the low drive spouse isn’t willing to give, I think the relationship is damaged or not fulfilling its purpose.
The same goes with emotional and spiritual intimacy. Marriage is a journey you take together. If you’re walk separately the entire time, don’t be surprised if you end up at different destinations.
|
|